Will COVID-19 trigger Force Majeure? I got this question in
the last couple of days from a few of my friends, colleagues and ex-colleagues.
I would say there cannot be a straight answer in YES or NO. The answer to the
triggering or applicability of Force Majeure lies in what manner and/or
circumstances the force majeure clause of an agreement has been drafted.
Let’s understand
this in detail. Force Majeure and vis-Major (i.e. act of god) are the part of inevitable accidents. Inevitable
accidents are defined, as any accidents that could not have been foreseen or
prevented by due care and diligence of any human being involved in it, or which
could not by any possibility is prevented from happening by the exercise of
ordinary care, caution and skill. Force Majeure means “superior force” which include war, riots, explosions
or other disasters, energy blackouts, unexpected legislation, lockouts,
slowdowns, and strikes, epidemic or pandemic diseases, other specified factors
or events may be relevant, such as the inability or incapacity to procure
necessary supplies or labour. Government action or market conditions may also
be considered as Force Majeure. Vis-major is a Latin maxim that means all
causes of an inevitable accident to be occasioned by elementary forces of
nature not connected with any agency of man or any other cause directly or
indirectly[i]. Typically,
circumstances identified in vis-major (i.e. acts of god) include earthquakes,
hurricanes, lightning, flood etc. Force Majeure has wider meaning (than vis
major) and includes events related to natural forces (an act of god) and also
includes other causes that may be related to anthropogenic forces. Inevitable
accidents alter parties' obligations under a contract when an extraordinary
event or circumstance beyond their control prevents one (or all) of them from
fulfilling those obligations, thereby avoiding a breach of the contract.
How do you draft and negotiate the clause may have a wide
range of consequences and implications, including but not limited to excusing
the affected party from performing the contract in part or whole. Engaging
legal counsel in this initial stage may be crucial to have a reasonable and
effective force majeure clause to avoid any miss-out.
When an affected party may be
exempted from performance of the contract:
(i) Where the term
epidemic, or pandemic, has been enlisted in the force majeure clause of an
agreement.
(ii) Where no relevant
words or such event is enlisted in the clause, it is a question of
interpretation by courts that whether the clause intended to cover epidemic or
pandemic as a force majeure event, if the list of events is non-exhaustive. If
it is interpreted by the court that epidemic, or pandemic as a force majeure
event. It may exempt affected party from performance of contract.
(iii) Contracts may have
"beyond the parties' reasonable control" verbiage which may save
affected party(ies) from performance of the contract. Determining whether this
covers issues arising from COVID-19 is a question of fact and interpretation.
When an affected party may not be
exempted from performance of the contract:
(i) Where the term the epidemic, or pandemic, has neither been listed in the force majeure events not
it is provided a non-exhaustive list.
(ii) The non-performance of
the contract was due to circumstances not beyond of their control; and there
were no reasonable steps taken to avoid or mitigate the event or its
consequences.
(iii) Generalized economic
hardship or increase in expenses does not constitute a force majeure event.
What other alternatives are on the
plate?
Parties should also consider the
following other potential remedies triggered by force majeure event, that is
(i) excusing performance only until the end of force majeure period; or (ii)
providing a party the option to purchase a lesser quantity of goods.
As the consequences of the COVID-19
pandemic amplifies, parties of contracts are starting looking to their
contracts for potential excuses for non-performance. Where the force majeure
clause is not provided, companies have begun to assess other alternative legal
mechanisms (e.g. section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872) to excuse the
nonperformance of the agreement.
[i] Ratanlal
& Dhirajlal, The law of Torts, 25th edition reprint 2009, Inevitable
Accidents, Page. 92.
Comments
Post a Comment