Skip to main content

Bradley Manning Trial

Statement by Julian Assange on Verdict in Bradley Manning Court-Martial

30 July 2013, 19:30 UTC

Today Bradley Manning, a whistleblower, was convicted by a military court at Fort Meade of 19 offences for supplying the press with information, including five counts of 'espionage'. He now faces a maximum sentence of 136 years.

The 'aiding the enemy' charge has fallen away. It was only included, it seems, to make calling journalism 'espionage' seem reasonable. It is not.

Bradley Manning's alleged disclosures have exposed war crimes, sparked revolutions, and induced democratic reform. He is the quintessential whistleblower.

This is the first ever espionage conviction against a whistleblower. It is a dangerous precedent and an example of national security extremism. It is a short sighted judgment that can not be tolerated and must be reversed. It can never be that conveying true information to the public is 'espionage'.

President Obama has initiated more espionage proceedings against whistleblowers and publishers than all previous presidents combined.

In 2008 presidential candidate Barack Obama ran on a platform that praised whistle blowing as an act of courage and patriotism. That platform has been comprehensively betrayed. His campaign document described whistleblowers as watchdogs when government abuses its authority. It was removed from the internet last week.

Throughout the proceedings there has been a conspicuous absence: the absence of any victim. The prosecution did not present evidence that - or even claim that - a single person came to harm as a result of Bradley Manning's disclosures. The government never claimed Mr. Manning was working for a foreign power.

The only 'victim' was the US government's wounded pride, but the abuse of this fine young man was never the way to restore it. Rather, the abuse of Bradley Manning has left the world with a sense of disgust at how low the Obama administration has fallen. It is not a sign of strength, but of weakness.

The judge has allowed the prosecution to substantially alter the charges after both the defense and the prosecution had rested their cases, permitted the prosecution 141 witnesses and extensive secret testimony. The government kept Bradley Manning in a cage, stripped him naked and isolated him in order to crack him, an act formally condemned by the United Nations Special Rapporteur for torture. This was never a fair trial.

The Obama administration has been chipping away democratic freedoms in the United States. With today's verdict, Obama has hacked off much more. The administration is intent on deterring and silencing whistleblowers, intent on weakening freedom of the press.

The US first amendment states that "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press". What part of 'no' does Barack Obama fail to comprehend?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A very heart Touching Lines from the Movie udaan

जो लहरों से आगे नज़र देख पाती तो तुम जान लेते मैं क्या सोचता हूँ वो आवाज़ तुमको भी जो भेद जाती तो तुम जान लेते मैं क्या सोचता हूँ जिद का तुम्हारे जो पर्दा सरकता तो खिडकियों से आगे भी तुम देख पाते आँखों से आदतों की जो पलकें हटाते तो तुम जान लेते मैं क्या सोचता हूँ मेरी तरह खुद पर होता ज़रा भरोसा तो कुछ दूर तुम भी साथ-साथ आते रंग मेरी आँखों का बांटते ज़रा सा तो कुछ दूर तुम भी साथ-साथ आते नशा आसमान का जो चूमता तुम्हें भी, हसरतें तुम्हारी नया जन्म पातीं खुद दुसरे जनम में मेरी उड़ान छूने कुछ दूर तुम भी साथ-साथ आते

Swami Vivekananda's Speeches (The World Parliament of Religions, Chicago ) Sept 27, 1893

Sisters and Brothers of America, It fills my heart with joy unspeakable to rise in response to the warm and cordial welcome which you have given us. I thank you in the name of the most ancient order of monks in the world; I thank you in the name of the mother of religions, and I thank you in the name of millions and millions of Hindu people of all classes and sects. My thanks, also, to some of the speakers on this platform who, referring to the delegates from the Orient, have told you that these men from far-off nations may well claim the honor of bearing to different lands the idea of toleration. I am proud to belong to a religion which has taught the world both tolerance and universal acceptance. We believe not only in universal toleration, but we accept all religions as true. I am proud to belong to a nation which has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of the earth. I am proud to tell you that we have gathered in our bosom the pure...

THE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY BILL, 2013 – PROS & CONS

Last year in December 2011, National Food Security Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha for the first time for the elimination of hunger and malnutrition in India and with an aim ―t o provide for food and nutritional security in human life cycle approach, by ensuring access to adequate quantity of quality food at affordable prices to people to live a life with dignity and for matter connected therewith or incidental thereto. ‖ After submission of report by Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution, the Union Cabinet passed the bill by an ordinance on July 4, 2013 and covered a way to make the broader framework of the proposed legislation simpler by providing more flexibility to States in its implementation and to address the vital concerns relating to food security.   Major Provisions of the bill are as follows :   1. The Bill has made provision for the State Government to provide 5 kilograms of food grains per person per month at subsidized prices ...